Amanda Brumfield – The Story of the Conviction

Amanda Brumfield entered public life involuntarily, but as a result of the tragedy she was convicted of aggravated manslaughter and spent several years in court. Her story is a convoluted account of a child who died, a significant family relation and a continued assertion of a false conviction. It is an in-depth analysis of what has happened that has characterized her story, beginning with the first incident up to her post-prison life.
Who is Amanda Brumfield?
Amanda Brumfield is the firstborn child of actor Billy Bob Thornton, who married to Melissa Lee Gatlin. She was brought up in a setting that was not much in the name of Hollywood, and she did not venture into the world of entertainment just like her father. She has created her life in Florida and far away from the world of celebrities. That is where, in 2008, something unexpected would happen, changing the future of her life and initiating a legal process that would last over a decade.
The 2008 Incident and Death of Olivia Garcia
Brumfield was looking after the one-year-old daughter of her best friend in October 2008. As Brumfield tells us, the child was trying to escape her playpen, fell a short distance, and hit her head. The trauma did not appear serious at first.

Although the child was rushed to the hospital, he was declared dead. This was followed by an autopsy that played a crucial role in the case. It showed a major skull fracture and internal bleeding, which the medical examiner could not attribute to a short fall. The case brought by the state against Brumfield was based on this expert opinion.
Arrest, Trial, and Conviction
After the results of the autopsy, Amanda Brumfield was arrested. The prosecution presented the case that the injury inflicted on Olivia was severe, thus showing that it was intentional, and not an accident as described by Brumfield. They had a case based on the fact that Brumfield was the cause of the fatal trauma directly.
In May 2011, Brumfield was acquitted of a first-degree murder and aggravated child abuse charge by a jury. She was found guilty of a minor offense of aggravated manslaughter of a child, though. This decision implied that the jury did not think that she intended to kill, but was guilty of inadvertently leading to the death of the child. She was then convicted to 20 years in a Florida state prison. Brumfield remained innocent in the whole process as she stuck to her initial explanation of a tragic accident.
The Wrongful Conviction Claims and the Innocence Project.
The case of Brumfield was later to receive the interest of the Innocence Project of Florida, an organization that advocates on behalf of people whom it feels are wrongfully convicted. The organization adopted her case, claiming that her conviction was a miscarriage of justice based on a misinformed and outdated medical science.
Scrutiny of Abusive Head Trauma Diagnosis
The core of the argument of the Innocence Project was the scientific understanding of pediatric head injuries that was changing. In the past, the decision to convict a defendant, such as Brumfield, was predominantly based on a three-symptom triad of subdural hematoma, bleeding in the retina, and brain swelling as the conclusive evidence of Abusive Head Trauma (AHT), also referred to as Shaken Baby Syndrome.
This long accepted medical certainty is, however, disputed by more recent research. Accidental short falls, now being proven by a rising field of evidence to include biomechanical studies, are capable, in certain cases, of generating the very forces that once could only bring about the same serious injuries labeled as the result of abuse.
This scientific change implies that not all the convictions, which are founded only on the triad, can be sound. The Innocence Project argued that Brumfield was wrongly convicted based on this controversial medical agreement, and Brumfield, who described an accident, had no other evidence that could show abuse, and her explanation of the accident was possible according to the new scientific perspective.
People Also Read: Ashcroft Capital Lawsuit Shakes Industry
Life After Incarceration and Release
Amanda Brumfield had served close to nine years in prison, after which she was released. It was due to the legal work that made her early release possible, which pointed out the possible loopholes in the original case against her. Brumfield has, since her freedom, been working on rebuilding her life the way she did without attention.
She is still included in the list of stories of the Innocence Project of Florida, as an example of the possible wrongful conviction due to ineffective science. Brumfield has been vocal of the huge hurdles of coming back to her life after almost ten years of imprisonment in committing a crime that she denies having committed. Her case still stands out as an important benchmark in legal and medical circles as to how AHT can be diagnosed and the evidentiary requirement of such prosecutions.
1 Comment
[…] People Also Read: Amanda Brumfield – The Story of the Conviction […]
Comments are closed.